JELLYFISH AND A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE

JELLYFISH AND A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE
BE CAREFUL!!! GOT A FRIEND WITH ME HAVING THE LUCKY FIN OF A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE! WE CAN BE VERBALLY AGGRESSIVE.

E = mc3: THE NEED FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY

E = mc3: THE NEED FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY
FUSION CUISINE: JESUS, EINSTEIN, and MICKEY MOUSE + INTERNETS (E = mc3) = TAO ~g(ZERO the HERO)d~OG

About Me

My photo
Hearing impaired (tendency to appear dumb, dense, and/or aloof), orthodox atheist (believe faith more harmful than doubt), self depreciating sense of humor (confident/not to be confused with low self esteem), ribald sense of humor (satorical/mocking when sensing Condescension), confirmed bachelor (my fate if not my choosing), freakish inclination (unpredictable non-traditionalist opinions), free spirit (nor conformist bohemian) Believe others have said it better...... "Jim! You can be SO SMART, but you can be SO DUMB!" "Jim! You make such a MARTYR of yourself." "He's a nice guy, but...." "You must be from up NORTH!" "You're such a DICK!" "You CRAZY!" "Where the HELL you from?" "Don't QUITE know how to take your personality." My favorite, "You have this... NEED... to be....HONEST!"

Saturday, January 27, 2018

Code Enforcers Officer Housworth and Cyclops Pay A Visit: "How Many Signs Do I Have In My Yard..?"





















**

"How many signs do I have in my yard toady?"
~(Simply Jim)~

(no answer)

"You don't know...
do you?"
~(Simply Jim)~


"We will just have to wait and see what '
THE JUDGE' 
says...
don't we?"
~(Simply Jim)~

"...nods head in the affirmative..."
~(Officer Housworth)~

"Then why have coder enforcers?  
Send 
'THE JUDGE' 
out here instead."
~(Simply Jim)~

***

















And I can't help but find it amusing 
how 
Chick-fil-a 
is the number one trash item thrown into my yard.

LOL

Friday, January 26, 2018

Law Office of Public Defender DeKalb County - Circuit Public Defender Claudia Saari's Email to Public Defender Whitney Gibbs About Appeal..?

***

Subject:Circuit Public Defender Claudia Saari's Email to Public Defender Whitney Gibbs About Appeal..?
From:James Avery (jeaverydvm87@att.net)
To:IJMCGAUG@DEKALBCOUNTYGA.GOV; wgibbs@dekalbcountyga.gov; memaloney@dekalbcountyga.gov; lstadalius@dekalbcountyga.gov; vasserbarber@centurytel.net; cssaari@dekalbcountyga.gov;
Cc:jladams@dekalbcountyga.gov; TALBREC@EMORY.EDU; THEALLUMS5@GMAIL.COM; kaspinwall@cccgeorgia.org; fred@clairmonthills.org; katnippr@hotmail.com; jbarber@seligenterprises.com; TCBARTELT@BELLSOUTH.NET; jerryB390@aol.com; G.BOICE@EMORY.EDU; cboone@ajc.com; billb@prumc.org; engjmb@emory.edu; BCLARK@GTLA.ORG; ROBINCLARK@GATRIALLAWYERS.NET; tonzaclark@dekalbcountyga.gov; jcusick@stmarkumc.org; SDARSEY@GLENNUMC.ORG; jhdavis@dekalbcountyga.gov; donna.devine@sbcglobal.net; denise.dillon@foxtv.com; mark.dorfman@bluepearlvet.com; bev@stbartsatlanta.org; celliot@emory.edu; isefilms1313@gmail.com; office@emorypresbyterian.org; rabbi@bethjacobatlanta.org; menahem2@012.net.il; Prescottfumc@centurylink.net; kgannon@dekalbcountyga.gov; Robert.givens@mac.com; ChosenOfTheLordAndPrecious@wbcstuff.com; WES.GRIFFIN@MCKESSON.COM; jhansen@stmarkumc.org; john.c.harper@emory.edu; mhayes@cccgeorgia.org; hinkelfamily21380@earthlink.net; mbah.vet@gmail.com; Mhousworth@dekalbcountyga.gov; prescottfumc@centurylink.net; BHUCKABY@GLENNUMC.ORG; tracye.hutchins@cbs46.com; SUSAN.HYLEN@EMORY.EDU; mkellum@dekalbcountyga.gov; jkhorozian@aacsatlanta.com; bethlp@stmarkumc.org; kattisan@comcast.net; JMLEMON@EMORY.EDU; RAMALLARD@MINDSPRING.COM; wwhittaker1@bellsouth.net; tmanns@emory.edu; civicassn@masonmill.org; mdmeeks@emory.edu; DMELLICK@HOTMAIL.COM; CMOBLEY@GLENNUMC.ORG; smullins@cccgeorgia.org; IJNEELY@DHR.STATE.GA.US; jnoblitt@stmarkumc.org; Patrick.Noonan@emory.edu; harveyoaxaca@hotmail.com; blorena@dekalbcountyga.gov; mmo@mmolaw.com; elena@elenaparent.com; kim.passoth@cbs46.com; SPINSON@GLENNUMC.ORG; mathew.pinson@emory.edu; Fred@clairmonthills.org; cpitts@cccgeorgia.org; kaitlyn.pratt@foxtv.com; jrader@dekalbcountyga.gov; dante.renzulli@cbs46.com; AROARK@GLENNUMC.ORG; AROGERS@GLENNUMC.ORG; ANDYROG@BBELLSOUTH.NET; CAROLYN.ROPER@YMAIL.COM; LIBCGR@EMORY.EDU; psaunders@thegavoice.com; BSETNOR@GLENNUMC.ORG; jsilver@dekalbcountyga.gov; bskarda@phumc.com; lsmallwood@sfvs.com; KENDALL.SOULEN@EMORY.EDU; BSPINKS@GLENNUMC.ORG; dcsctdinfo@dekalbcountyga.gov; sstephens@stmarkumc.org; owen@clairmontpres.org; kimsteam@hotmail.com; kimmy@clairmontpres.org; BRENT.STRAWN@EMORY.EDU; mac@stbartsatlanta.org; bczellars@dekalbcountyga.gov;
Date:Friday, January 26, 2018 12:51 AM


Hello Ingrid,

At it relates to following email Whitney had included among copies requested of everything (if any) my file having with our Law Office of Public Defender DeKalb County:

James Avery

Saari, Claudia
Thu 1/26/2017  9:13 AM

To:  Gibbs, Whitney <wgibbs@dekalbcountyga.gov>;

Cc:  McGaughey, Ingrid <ijmcgaug@dekalbcountyga.gov>;

Whitney,


Can you please contact Mr. Avery and see if he wants to appeal and if so, will he hire his own attorney or does he want the court to appoint us to represent him on appeal.  This was quite a case and it appears to me there are some excellent issues to appeal.  I also heard that you did a wonderful job representing a very challenging client.

Thanks,

Claudia


Claudia S. Saari
Circuit Public Defender
Law Office of the Public Defender
DeKalb County, Stone Mountain Circuit
320 Church Street
Decatur, GA 30030
404.371.2222
cssaari@dekalbcountyga.gov


***

Why, after so many attempts, am I unable getting anyone from our Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County answering...

1) Per our Circuit Public Defender Claudia Saari, what were these excellent issues to appeal?  

2) What was the answer given to our Circuit Public Defender Claudia. Saari by Court Ordered Public Defender Whitney Gibbs assigned to me by our Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County?

3) What were the reasons (unsolicited) given to my Court Ordered Public Defender Whitney Gibbs assigned me by our Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County and and the gentlemen having accompanied Public Defender Whitney Gibbs in place of Public Defender "Handling Those Cases Involving Mental Health Issues" Ingrid McGaughey  as to why I would not be appealing this case;  when asked of me for the first time just before we walking into the courtroom and having to answer this very same question asked by our Honorable Judge Matthew McCoyd? of my Court Ordered Public Defender Whitney Gibbs assigned me by our Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County?

And I'm believing I ought a  right expecting from our Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County... answers ...to these questions in the form of hard copy evidence..?

Sincerely yours,

Simply Jim



P.S.

One more thing.  

Remember me once telling you, how, websites having caught my attention have a habit of changing contents once I start sharing my opinions of them?  

Well the same thing happened with blog entry titled The Sentencing of Willie F. discovered during my internet research of Court Ordered Public Defender Whitney Gibbs assigned me by our Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County!  This blog entry is no longer accessible!  So I reached out to this lawyer David Abbott through his website asking why?



Just a question about a blog entry of yours having caught my attention; now seeming to have disappeared.   Curious as to why it was removed..?  The Sentencing of Willie F..  Posted March 26, 2015.  

 Whitney Gibbs was Judge Matthew McCoyd's court ordered public defender assigned me by Law Office of Public Defender DeKalb County.  The public defender ending up assigned me even after application for representation by public defender rejected  because of owning 100% equity my home located North Druid Hills neighborhood within walking distance of Emory University.  

Again, just curious as to why this blog entry no longer accessible?  

While I'm having your attention, I'm hoping you might answer one other question/concern of mine: 

 As it relates to recidivism, what's the difference between the five years prosecution was asking for and the one year sentencing Willie F. ending up serving?  From what I've been able witnessing through my own experiences with DeKalb County's jail and mental health services,  I'm currently thinking 1 felony vs. 5 felonies...?  That's  $18,000.00 per year per inmate X 4 of taxpayers money now available applying to programs that truly reduce recidivism. (As an afterthought, wish I had said "applying to programs that truly addresses the root causes of our crimes" instead.  As in, before these crimes even happening!)  Shouldn't someone have brought this to the attention of the Johnson Democrat Judge presiding over this The Sentencing of Willie F.?



And I have yet to hear from him..?



The Sentencing of Willie F.
By theabbott159003177, Mar 26 2015  04:18PM

Non-negotiated guilty pleas are where trial judges earn their pay. Most pleas are negotiated. The prosecutor and the defense attorney have agreed on the sentence in advance, and the judge’s role is limited to approving or rejecting it. Over 95% of the time, trial judges defer to the prosecutors and approve the plea bargain. Nevertheless, a trial judge's sentencing philosophy looms large in plea negotiations. Defendants do not agree to do hard time for their health or for the conversation of their prospective bunkmates. They do so out of fear that the judge would give them even more time if they were convicted at trial or entered a non-negotiated plea.

Willie F. is in his seventh decade, and has almost as many felony convictions. On March 25, he appeared in the Henry County Superior Court, his wrists and ankles shackled, indicted for burglarizing a shed.

The prosecutor, Assistant District Attorney Christina Kempter, recommended five years in prison. She tersely explained that the defendant had an extensive criminal history, including two burglary convictions, and argued that this justified the maximum sentence for second degree burglary. Willie’s attorney, Assistant Public Defender Whitney Gibbs, explained that her client was addicted to drugs and soon to become a father. She asked for probation and drug treatment so that her 62-year old client could meet his paternal obligations. After no more than a few hundred words from the attorneys, the Honorable Wade Crumbley began to earn his pay.

Judge Crumbley is a credit to the Georgia bench. Son of a Henry County landowner, a long-time Democrat, he was taunted on the elementary school playground because his parents supported President Johnson, who won passage of the Civil Rights Act. Crumbley had the intellect, the probity, and the tact to win appointment to the bench by a Republican governor. In 2006, he defeated Donnie Patton, a conservative city court judge, in an election where the Republican gubernatorial candidate won Henry County 62% to 34%. He ran unopposed in 2010 and 2014. Compared to his peers, Judge Crumbley is unusually patient. That Willie F.’s sentencing took no more than 15 minutes speaks volumes about the brisk pace of Georgia justice.

No evidence was introduced during the sentencing. The attorneys recited the facts informally and Willie occasionally answered questions. Judge Crumbley spoke more than either of the lawyers. He began by explaining that, when he was a lawyer, he often entered non-negotiated pleas and that people thought him brave because he was exposing his clients to the maximum sentence. After the prosecutor’s pithy recitation of Willie’s criminal history, Judge Crumbley asked when Willie’s first conviction occurred. The prosecutor browsed her file and said 1980. He asked when Willie’s most recent felony conviction was entered. The prosecutor first answered 2006 but, upon further review of her file, discovered that this was a misdemeanor shoplifting conviction and changed her answer to the early naughts. The judge asked if any of Willie’s convictions were violent. The prosecutor answered that he had twice been charged with aggravated assault. Willie chimed in that those charges had been dismissed and, upon further review of her file, the prosecutor agreed.

Judge Crumbley then turned to the facts of the case. Did Willie break into the shed, or did he just open the door? What did he steal? The prosecutor again leafed through her file. To her credit, she met the judge’s probing with candor. There were no signs of forced entry. Willie opened the door to a shed, stole a $200 air compressor, and put it in his truck. When he drove away, the property owner’s son followed him. For reasons that remain unexplained, Willie stopped his truck and gave back the air compressor. He was subsequently arrested on a warrant. It is unclear whether these facts, which are surely less heinous than a typical repeat burglary, would have come out but for Judge Crumbley’s persistent questioning.

The public defender was in a tight spot. Willie had insisted to her that the air compressor was just lying outside, and that he never entered the shed. His story contradicted the victim’s account, conveniently cleared its author of the burglary, and came from the lips of a repeat felon. A swearing contest between the property owner and Willie would have been an uneven fight, Willie probably would have been convicted of burglary, and the judge probably would have imposed a harsher sentence after a trial than after a guilty plea. On the other hand, denying guilt at the time you plead guilty is generally a bad idea. It suggests that you cannot admit your mistakes and that your only regret is being caught. I have never talked to Willie and don’t know how insistently he denied entering the shed.

Had I defended the case, I would have taken a field trip. Flotsam and jetsam grace many a Georgia yard. The shed may have been visible from the nearest road or from the driveway. It is perfectly legal to take pictures from a public street or to walk up to someone’s front door and talk to them. A surprising number of people will talk to a lawyer who rolls up unannounced, especially one wearing a seersucker suit. I would have taken some pictures of the yard from a lawful vantage point. If it was immaculate, these pictures would have showed Willie that his story was bull and made for a cleaner plea. If there had been tools scattered across the yard, they would have backed up Willie’s story, and turned his trial into a fair fight. The property owner might even have seen that her story could be impeached, become shy about going to court, and encouraged the state to offer a misdemeanor guilty plea.

A little investigation can go a long way, especially when no one is prone to believe your client. A motivated public defender can do this type of investigation. A public defender in Henry County might handle 20-25 cases a year that are as serious as Willie’s. (Roughly one in four cases in the Henry County Superior Court result in prison time, and the defense attorney knows the prosecution’s recommendation in advance). Driving out to a house one evening and taking some pictures might take an hour or two and is certainly more fun than sitting in your office.

Judge Crumbley finessed the complications created by Willie protesting his innocence to his attorney. The judge pointed out that, if Willie had just picked up a loose compressor, he would only be guilty of a misdemeanor and that he was pleading guilty to burglary. Willie acquiesced, and the plea went forward. It became a conversation between the judge and Willie.

The judge explained that it has become “politically correct” to impose shorter sentences than were once the norm. Those who want to “lock people up and throw away the key” have not so much changed their minds as seen the effects of their thinking on the budget. The judge asked Willie if he had gone to prison as a young man. Willie had. The judge asked if, after getting out of prison, Willie had found it hard to find work and had gotten into a cycle of poverty and addiction in which he could only get by through stealing. Willie agreed. The judge explained that it is late in the game for any “talking cure” to treat Willie’s addiction, and that he didn’t want to put Willie on probation because he thought Willie would just be back in court for a violation of probation. He sentenced Willie to a year in prison, with credit for the 56 days he had spent in jail awaiting his court date. Willie is unlikely to parole out before that sentence is over.

Judge Crumbley’s sentence is at the low end of what Georgia judges would impose, yet it is far more than a slap on the wrist. Willie deprived a family of its air compressor for a few minutes. He gave it back when confronted. He did not carry a weapon, did not hurt anyone, and doesn’t look very scary. He caused far less harm that a bank that makes abusive loans or an employer that offshores jobs. Yet Willie’s sins were crimes and easily proven ones at that. Despite Judge Crumbley’s humanity, locking Willie up for a year will cost the good people of Georgia at least $18,000, more if he requires serious medical care. Our sheds and air compressors will remain safe even if our homes and jobs remain precarious.


GOOD THING I SAVED IT!




Attachments






  • David Abbott Law Firm Superior Results.jpg (557.94KB)
  • the sentencing of willie f -abbott law firm.jpg (988.71KB)
  • the sentencing of willie f -abbott law firm (4).jpg (1.32MB)
  • the sentencing of willie f -abbott law firm (5).jpg (1.16MB)

***

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County

***
Subject:Meeting
From:McGaughey, Ingrid (ijmcgaug@dekalbcountyga.gov)
To:jeaverydvm87@att.net;
Date:Tuesday, January 23, 2018 2:52 PM


Dear Dr. Avery,

I do not yet have the evaluation.   However,  would you like to meet me at my office at 2pm on Friday 1/26 to discuss the upcoming hearing.

Sincerely,
Ingrid McGaughey


***


Subject:Re: Meeting
From:James Avery (jeaverydvm87@att.net)
To:ijmcgaug@dekalbcountyga.gov;
Date:Tuesday, January 23, 2018 7:07 PM


Hello Ingrid,

Sure.  Why not.

See you this coming Friday January 26th, 2 pm our Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County.

Sincerely yours,

Simply Jim

P.S.

I've haven't heard back from Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities about this evaluation report either.



***

Saturday, January 20, 2018

Apple-Table-Penny: Defendant 1840 Mason Mill Road (case # 026695)

***
Subject:Apple-Table-Penny: Defendant 1840 Mason Mill Road (case # 026695)
From:James Avery (jeaverydvm87@att.net)
To:Christy.wreyford@dbhdd.ga.gov;
Cc:jladams@dekalbcountyga.gov; TALBREC@EMORY.EDU; THEALLUMS5@GMAIL.COM; kaspinwall@cccgeorgia.org; fred@clairmonthills.org; katnippr@hotmail.com; jbarber@seligenterprises.com; TCBARTELT@BELLSOUTH.NET; jerryB390@aol.com; G.BOICE@EMORY.EDU; cboone@ajc.com; billb@prumc.org; engjmb@emory.edu; BCLARK@GTLA.ORG; ROBINCLARK@GATRIALLAWYERS.NET; tonzaclark@dekalbcountyga.gov; jcusick@stmarkumc.org; SDARSEY@GLENNUMC.ORG; jhdavis@dekalbcountyga.gov; donna.devine@sbcglobal.net; denise.dillon@foxtv.com; mark.dorfman@bluepearlvet.com; bev@stbartsatlanta.org; celliot@emory.edu; isefilms1313@gmail.com; office@emorypresbyterian.org; rabbi@bethjacobatlanta.org; menahem2@012.net.il; Prescottfumc@centurylink.net; kgannon@dekalbcountyga.gov; wgibbs@dekalbcountyga.gov; Robert.givens@mac.com; ChosenOfTheLordAndPrecious@wbcstuff.com; WES.GRIFFIN@MCKESSON.COM; jhansen@stmarkumc.org; mhayes@cccgeorgia.org; hinkelfamily21380@earthlink.net; mbah.vet@gmail.com; Mhousworth@dekalbcountyga.gov; prescottfumc@centurylink.net; BHUCKABY@GLENNUMC.ORG; tracye.hutchins@cbs46.com; SUSAN.HYLEN@EMORY.EDU; mkellum@dekalbcountyga.gov; bethlp@stmarkumc.org; kattisan@comcast.net; JMLEMON@EMORY.EDU; RAMALLARD@MINDSPRING.COM; wwhittaker1@bellsouth.net; memaloney@dekalbcountyga.gov; tmanns@emory.edu; civicassn@masonmill.org; IJMCGAUG@DEKALBCOUNTYGA.GOV; mdmeeks@emory.edu; DMELLICK@HOTMAIL.COM; CMOBLEY@GLENNUMC.ORG; smullins@cccgeorgia.org; IJNEELY@DHR.STATE.GA.US; jnoblitt@stmarkumc.org; Patrick.Noonan@emory.edu; harveyoaxaca@hotmail.com; blorena@dekalbcountyga.gov; mmo@mmolaw.com; elena@elenaparent.com; kim.passoth@cbs46.com; SPINSON@GLENNUMC.ORG; mathew.pinson@emory.edu; Fred@clairmonthills.org; cpitts@cccgeorgia.org; kaitlyn.pratt@foxtv.com; jrader@dekalbcountyga.gov; dante.renzulli@cbs46.com; AROARK@GLENNUMC.ORG; AROGERS@GLENNUMC.ORG; ANDYROG@BBELLSOUTH.NET; CAROLYN.ROPER@YMAIL.COM; LIBCGR@EMORY.EDU; cssaari@dekalbcountyga.gov; psaunders@thegavoice.com; BSETNOR@GLENNUMC.ORG; jsilver@dekalbcountyga.gov; lsmallwood@sfvs.com; KENDALL.SOULEN@EMORY.EDU; BSPINKS@GLENNUMC.ORG; lstadalius@dekalbcountyga.gov; dcsctdinfo@dekalbcountyga.gov; sstephens@stmarkumc.org; owen@clairmontpres.org; kimsteam@hotmail.com; kimmy@clairmontpres.org; BRENT.STRAWN@EMORY.EDU; mac@stbartsatlanta.org; vasserbarber@centurytel.net; bczellars@dekalbcountyga.gov;
Date:Saturday, January 20, 2018 11:07 PM


Hello Ms. Wreyford,

My names is James Edward Avery,DVM ; resident defendant 1840 Mason Mill Road, Decatur, GA 30033.

Sorry to intrude.  But on the day of November 30, 2017, I met with a Dr. Peggy Flanagan at our Law Office of Public Defender DeKalb County for a court ordered competency evaluation.

And I'm repeatedly being told by my court ordered public defender, Ingrid McGaughey, that she has reached out to our DBHDD;  yet to receive anything in the way of a report from our DBHDD of this competency evaluation having taken our Dr. Peggy Flanagan of Forensic Psychiatry Services...at most...two hour performing.

For a probation revocation hearing continued as a result of our Honorable Judge Matthew McCoyd giving in to his court ordered public defender assigned me by our Law Office of Public Defender DeKalb County pleading/begging him for this competency evaluation...ALREADY... reset to resume January 30, 2018.

Would it be possible of Dr. Flanagan emailing me an explanation as to why this report  taking so long?  Maybe even emailing directly to me a copy of this report once finished?

THE COURT: 

WE ARE HERE ON FRIDAY, JANUARY 20, 2017.  THIS CASE IS THE DEKALB COUNTY VS. JAMES EDWARD AVERY CASE. THIS CASE WAS ESPECIALLY SET FOR TRIAL. IT'S NOW 1:23 AND WE ARE ON THE RECORD.

FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE RECEIVED A MOTION TO NOLLE PROS A NUMBER OF THE CITATIONS AGAINST MR. AVERY FROM THE SOLICITOR, AND I NEED TO KNOW WHETHER THE DEFENDANT HAS ANY OBJECTION TO THE ENTRY OF THE NOLLE PROS.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

COUNSEL WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION TO THE NOLLE PROS ORDER.

THE COURT: 

WELL, THAT IS GOOD BUT DOESN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE DEFENDANT OBJECTS TO THE NOLLE PROS.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

YOUR HONOR, AND THIS WILL GO INTO WHY I'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COURT.

INGRID MCGAUGHEY WITH THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE.  I AM NOT ATTORNEY OF RECORD ON THIS CASE. MS. WHITNEY GIBBS IS. MS. WHITNEY GIBBS HAS ASKED ME TO ASSIST HER BECAUSE I AM ONE OF THE ATTORNEYS FOR THE PUBLIC
DEFENDER'S OFFICE WHO HANDLES THE CASES INVOLVING MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES.

THE COURT: 

YES, MA'AM.

MS. MCGAUGHEY:

 I HAVE SPOKEN TO MR. AVERY ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS, AND I KNOW THAT MR. AVERY WILL NOT AGREE WITH ME ON THIS -- TWO OCCASIONS, I BELIEVE IT WAS THAT I SAT DOWN WITH HIM. IN ADDITION, I HAVE BEEN PRIVY TO SOME OF HIS 
E-MAILS THAT HE HAS SENT MS. GIBBS. I HAVE VIEWED SOME OF THE VIDEOS THAT HE HAS ONLINE.

AND IN SPEAKING WITH MR. AVERY, MR. AVERY APPEARS TO BE A BRIGHT INDIVIDUAL. HE SEEMS TO KNOW WHAT THE MECHANICS OF THE COURT PROCEEDING ARE, HOWEVER, I DO NOT BELIEVE HE IS COMPETENT TO PROCEED. I KNOW THE COURT HAD INITIALLY ORDERED A COMPETENCY EVALUATION.  D.B.H.D.D. (Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities) INFORMED THE COURT THAT THEY WOULD NOT BE DOING IT BECAUSE IT WASN'T WITHIN THEIR PREVIEW. AND AT THAT POINT IN TIME IT WOULD BECOME AN ISSUE FOR THE COURT, WHETHER THE COURT WAS WILLING TO HIRE A PRIVATE TO DO THAT EVALUATION.

MR. AVERY'S ISSUES FOR US QUESTIONING HIS COMPETENCY HAVE TO DO WITH HIS ABILITY TO ASSIST COUNSEL. WE ALSO QUESTION HIS ACTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THIS FORUM IS FOR. WHILE WE HAVE GONE OVER THE MECHANICS OF A TRIAL AND WHAT TODAY ENCOMPASSES, IT SEEMS TO BE MR. AVERY'S BELIEF
THAT THIS IS A FORUM AND WHERE HE WILL BE ABLE TO TELL EVERYBODY WHAT HIS GRIEVANCES ARE TOWARDS THE COMMUNITY AND FOR THEM TO ENTER INTO SOME SORT OF MEANINGFUL DIALOGUE WITH HIM. IN REPEATEDLY SPEAKING TO HIM, HE DOES NOT APPEAR TO FULLY COMPREHEND THAT.

IN ADDITION, WHEN IT COMES TO ASSISTING IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF HIS CASE, HE IS -- HIS SPEECH PATTERN IS RAMBLING, IT'S TANGENTIAL. HE IS UNABLE TO FOCUS ON THESE ISSUES WITHOUT GOING INTO MULTIPLE UNRELATED ISSUES OR
MULTIPLE PERIPHERY ISSUES. WE THINK THAT IN GOING FORWARD WITH A TRIAL, WHERE HIS LIBERTY WOULD BE IN JEOPARDY, THAT THIS WOULD VIOLATE HIS DUE-PROCESS RIGHTS AND WE DO NOT BELIEVE HE IS COMPETENT.

THE COURT: 

SO, MS. MCGAUGHEY, I APPRECIATE YOUR STATEMENTS. THE PROBLEM I HAVE IS THAT I HAVE ASKED REPEATEDLY WHETHER YOUR OFFICE HAS COUNSEL FOR MR. AVERY.  I APPOINTED YOUR OFFICE AS COUNSEL FOR MR. AVERY EVEN THOUGH HE DOESN'T QUALIFY BECAUSE I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT HIS RIGHTS WERE PROTECTED. AND I HAVE ASKED REPEATEDLY WHETHER YOUR OFFICE WAS GOING TO FILE A MOTION SEEKING A COMPETENCY HEARING AND I HAVE BEEN  REPEATEDLY TOLD THAT YOU WERE NOT GOING TO DO THAT. AND I HAVE A
PROBLEM WITH HEARING THAT THE POSITION OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE IS THAT HE'S NOT COMPETENT 20 MINUTES AFTER A SPECIALLY SET TRIAL IS SET TO BEGIN. THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON NOW FOR EIGHT MONTHS.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

I UNDERSTAND THAT, YOUR HONOR.

THE COURT:

I BELIEVE THAT TO THE EXTENT THAT THERE IS AN ISSUE, IT'S BEEN WAIVED.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH THE COURT.

THE COURT: 

I UNDERSTAND.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

COMPETENCY IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT ARE FLUID. I HAVE SPOKEN WITH MR. AVERY AT TIMES WHERE HE DID MAKE MORE SENSE. IN LIGHT OF SOME E-MAILS
THAT WERE SENT WITHIN THE LAST 24 HOURS, IN LIGHT OF MY CONVERSATION WITH HIM TODAY, IN LIGHT OF MY SOCIAL WORKERS' CONVERSATIONS -- WE HAVE HAD ALL THREE SOCIAL WORKERS TALK TO HIM TODAY -- I DO NOT BELIEVE HE IS
COMPETENT IN THE HEARING NOW.

THE COURT: 

BEFORE I ASK THE COUNTY WHAT THEIR POSITION IS, I'D LIKE TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IT IS YOU ARE ASKING ME TO DO.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

WE ARE ASKING THE COURT TO MAKE AN INQUIRY, BE IT THROUGH A DOCTOR, OF MR. AVERY'S COMPETENCY.

THE COURT: 

SO ARE YOU MOVING TO HAVE A COMPETENCY HEARING?

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

YOUR HONOR, WE DO NOT HAVE A -- WE DO NOT HAVE A DOCTOR AT THIS POINT IN TIME. IF THE COURT WISHES TO GO FORWARD WITHOUT A DOCTOR, I BELIEVE THAT
MR. AVERY'S BEHAVIOR WOULD SPEAK FOR ITSELF QUITE FRANKLY.

THE COURT: 

SO WHAT IS IT YOU'RE ASKING ME TO DO?

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

WE WOULD ASK THAT YOU EITHER CONTINUE THE CASE --

THE DEFENDANT: 

(GESTURING AT THE GALLERY)

THE DEPUTY: 

SIR.

THE COURT: 

HE NEEDS TO STOP THAT.

MS. MCGAUGHEY:

 -- FOR COMPETENCY EVALUATION. IF THE COURT IS NOT WILLING TO DO THAT, THEN WE COULD PROCEED WITH A COMPETENCY EVALUATION AND LET THE COURT MAKE THAT DECISION AS TO HIS COMPETENCY.

THE COURT: 

WE'RE GOING TO PROCEED WITH THE COMPETENCY EVALUATION NOW?

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

WE DO NOT HAVE A DOCTOR TO PROCEED WITH THE AN EVALUATION AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

THE COURT: 

SO YOU'RE ASKING ME TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL SO THAT YOU CAN GO GET A DOCTOR TO HAVE --

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

WE'RE --

THE COURT: 

-- A COMPETENCY HEARING.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

WE'RE ASKING THE COURT -- IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING THIS WAS AN EVALUATION THAT WAS INITIALLY ORDERED BY THE COURT.

THE COURT:

 IT WAS INITIALLY ORDERED BY THE COURT,  BUT THEN WHEN THE COURT WAS TOLD THAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT WOULD NOT PERFORM THE EVALUATION, I INFORMED EVERYBODY OF THAT. AND AT THAT TIME, I ASKED WHETHER DEFENSE WAS GOING TO FILE A MOTION SEEKING A COMPETENCY EVALUATION, AND I WAS TOLD NO.

MS. MCGAUGHEY:

 I UNDERSTAND THAT, YOUR HONOR. YOUR HONOR --

THE COURT: 

SO ARE YOU NOW FILING A MOTION ASKING FOR A COMPETENCY EVALUATION?

MS. MCGAUGHEY:

I'M ASKING FOR THE COURT TO PROVIDE THE FUNDS FOR THAT COMPETENCY EVALUATION SINCE GEORGIA REGIONAL WILL NOT DO IT.

THE COURT: 

WHAT SAYS THE COUNTY?

MR. GETZ: 

THE COUNTY IS READY, YOUR HONOR.

THE COURT: 

MS. MCGAUGHEY, I HAVE A GREAT DEAL RESPECT FOR YOU AND I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE DOING YOUR JOB, BUT I'M NOT GOING TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

THANK YOU, JUDGE.

THE COURT: 

MY POSITION IS THE ISSUE -- I'VE REPEATEDLY ASKED AND I'VE BEEN REPEATEDLY BEEN TOLD NO, AND SO WE'RE HERE, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A TRIAL.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

AND WE WOULD JUST LIKE OUR OBJECTION NOTED FOR THE RECORD, YOUR HONOR.

THE COURT: 

YES, MA'AM.

MS. MCGAUGHEY: 

THANK YOU.

THE COURT:

SO NOTED. ALL RIGHT.

MS. GIBBS: 

YOUR HONOR, IS THERE A HEARING DEVICE FOR MR. AVERY AT THIS POINT?

THE COURT: 

IS THERE A WHAT?

MS. GIBBS:

 IS THERE A HEARING DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR MR. AVERY SO HE CAN HEAR THE COURT PROCEEDINGS?

THE COURT: 

THERE SHOULD BE.

SO, DEPUTY, THIS DEFENDANT HAS HEARING ISSUES. TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES, SO WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY TO ALLOW TO ASSIST HIM HEARING THE PROCEEDINGS. WE NEED TO INQUIRE ABOUT IT.

THE DEPUTY:

 WE HAVE IT?

THE COURT:

WE DO. WE DO HAVE IT.

THE DEPUTY: 

OKAY.

THE COURT: 

OKAY.

THE DEPUTY: 

I DON'T KNOW WHERE TO GET IT FROM.

(THE DEPUTIES CONFERRED.)

THE COURT: 

ALL RIGHT. WELL, I THINK WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A VERY BRIEF DELAY WHILE WE TRY TO MAKE SURE THAT THE TECHNOLOGY THAT CAN ASSIST THE DEFENDANT HEARING THE PROCEEDINGS IS BROUGHT DOWN. THEN WE'LL PROCEED.



Until receiving the results of this competency evaluation, we pretty much can continue expecting these court ordered public defenders assigned me by our Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County being dismissive of anything and everything  I'm having to say to my defense until too late!




Then again, this may be...EXACTLY...what they be paid doing..?




I've already told both Dr. Flanagan and Public Defender Ingrid McGaughey at the end of this competency evaluation, "I'm fast finding myself in the beginnings of an understanding of what may explain in part the driving force behind the Alt-Right Movement having helped propel Trump into the Oval Office."

Please let Dr. Flanagan know, following along the same line of reasoning as I had with our Alt-Right Movement, it important to add; "And with those of fathers (any head of household really) having turned guns upon their own families...before themselves." 

Already known to my Public Defender, please have Dr. Flanagan take notice, that by January 30th, 2018,  whether the probation revocation hearing resumed or not,  I will no longer have the cash available enabling me to continue living the life I've grown accustomed without the sale of my home and moving to a different neighborhood. 

Rest assured, I own no gun.




Sincerely yours,

Not Defined, Undefined, Unidentified~g(8!0)d~James E. Avery, Herd Health Medicine

P.S.



You do not conclude until understanding.  Once understanding, you do not judge.

Therefore, It is the job of our Honorable Judge Matthew McCoyd...CONCLUDING...these hearings,,,BEFORE UNDERSTANDING...in a way that...GIVES THE APPEARANCE OF JUSTICE...having been served.

But to whom?





REMEMBER NOW!

Although appointed to the bench, our Honorable Judge Matthew McCoyd still considered an elected representative. 

AUTOMATICALLY!

He comes to us...FULLY FRONT LOADED..having bias.

PREJUDICED!




THE COURT: 

ALL RIGHT. WELL, I THINK WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A VERY BRIEF DELAY WHILE WE TRY TO MAKE SURE THAT THE TECHNOLOGY THAT CAN ASSIST THE DEFENDANT HEARING THE PROCEEDINGS IS BROUGHT DOWN. THEN WE'LL PROCEED.

If anyone cared enough reading what the rest of this transcript from the trial having to say, you will see that our Honorable Judge Matthew McCoyd proceeded with the trial immediately before we having the technology needed assisting the defendant.

LOL


***


Subject:APPLE-TABLE-PENNY: Defendant 1840 Mason Mill Road
From:James Avery (jeaverydvm87@att.net)
To:Christy.wreyford@dbhdd.ga.gov;
Date:Tuesday, January 23, 2018 10:49 PM


Hello Ms. Wreyford,

This is James Avery; defendant 1840 Mason Mill Road with whom Dr. Peggy Flanagan recently performed a court ordered competency evaluation at the request of our Law Office of Public Defenders DeKalb County Ingrid McGaughey.   

I recently sent you an email January 20th trying to get in touch with Dr. Flanagan.  

Just wanting to know if you've received this email?  Also, whether or not I can expect to hear anything from DBHDD before my next meeting with my court ordered public defender Ingrid McGaughey this coming Friday; most certainly before upcoming probation revocation hearing set to resume January 30, 2018?

Sincerely yours,

James E. Avery, DVM
1840 Mason Mill Road
Decatur, GA 30033
(404)788-9263
JEAveryDVM87@att.net 



***


Subject:Re: Apple-Table-Penny: Defendant 1840 Mason Mill Road (case # 026695)
From:donna.devine@sbcglobal.net (donna.devine@sbcglobal.net)
To:jeaverydvm87@att.net;
Date:Wednesday, January 24, 2018 11:46 AM


Will you accept a thousand dollars from me to pay bills❤️

Sent from my iPhone


***


Subject:Re: Apple-Table-Penny: Defendant 1840 Mason Mill Road (case # 026695)
From:James Avery (jeaverydvm87@att.net)
To:donna.devine@sbcglobal.net;
Date:Wednesday, January 24, 2018 6:54 PM


Hello Donna,

Thank you; but going to politely decline the offer.

Sincerely yours,

Simply Jim


***