JELLYFISH AND A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE

JELLYFISH AND A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE
BE CAREFUL!!! GOT A FRIEND WITH ME HAVING THE LUCKY FIN OF A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE! WE CAN BE VERBALLY AGGRESSIVE.

E = mc3: THE NEED FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY

E = mc3: THE NEED FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY
FUSION CUISINE: JESUS, EINSTEIN, and MICKEY MOUSE + INTERNETS (E = mc3) = TAO ~g(ZERO the HERO)d~OG

About Me

My photo
Hearing impaired (tendency to appear dumb, dense, and/or aloof), orthodox atheist (believe faith more harmful than doubt), self depreciating sense of humor (confident/not to be confused with low self esteem), ribald sense of humor (satorical/mocking when sensing Condescension), confirmed bachelor (my fate if not my choosing), freakish inclination (unpredictable non-traditionalist opinions), free spirit (nor conformist bohemian) Believe others have said it better...... "Jim! You can be SO SMART, but you can be SO DUMB!" "Jim! You make such a MARTYR of yourself." "He's a nice guy, but...." "You must be from up NORTH!" "You're such a DICK!" "You CRAZY!" "Where the HELL you from?" "Don't QUITE know how to take your personality." My favorite, "You have this... NEED... to be....HONEST!"

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Elizabeth Warren - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia








Elizabeth Warren - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: Elizabeth Ann Warren[2] (née Herring; born June 22, 1949[3]) is an American academic and politician who is the senior United States Senator from Massachusetts and a member of the Democratic Party. She was previously a Harvard Law School professor specializing in bankruptcy law. Warren is an active consumer protection advocate whose work led to the conception and establishment of the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. She has written a number of academic and popular works, and is a frequent subject of media interviews regarding the American economy and personal finance.

Following the 2008 financial crisis, Warren served as chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel created to oversee the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). She later served as Assistant to the President and Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau under President Barack Obama. During the late 2000s, she was recognized by publications such as the National Law Journal and the Time 100 as an increasingly influential public policy figure.

In September 2011, Warren announced her candidacy for the U.S. Senate, challenging Republican incumbent Scott Brown. She won the general election on November 6, 2012, becoming the first female Senator from Massachusetts. She was assigned to the Senate Special Committee on Aging; the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee; and the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.

Warren has been described as a leading figure in the Democratic Party and among American progressives,[4][5] and has frequently been mentioned by political pundits as a potential 2016 presidential candidate despite Warren's repeated statements that she is not running for president.

Warren was born on June 22, 1949,[3][8] in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to working class parents Pauline (née Reed) and Donald Jones Herring.[9][10][11] She was their fourth child, with three older brothers.

She became a star member of the debate team at Northwest Classen High School and won the title of "Oklahoma's top high-school debater" while competing with debate teams from high schools throughout the state.

Warren voted as a Republican for many years saying, "I was a Republican because I thought that those were the people who best supported markets".[16] She states that in 1995 she began to vote Democratic because she no longer believed that to be true, but she says that she has voted for both parties because she believed that neither party should dominate.

On September 14, 2011, Warren declared her intention to run for the Democratic nomination for the 2012 election in Massachusetts for the United States Senate. The seat had been won by Republican Scott Brown in a 2010 special election after the death of Ted Kennedy.[43][44] A week later, a video of Warren speaking in Andover became popular on the internet.[45] In it, Warren replies to the charge that asking the rich to pay more taxes is "class warfare," pointing out that no one grew rich in America without depending on infrastructure paid for by the rest of society, stating:
There is nobody in this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. ... You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for; you hired workers the rest of us paid to educate; you were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn't have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did. Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea. God bless. Keep a big hunk of it. But part of the underlying social contract is, you take a hunk of that and pay forward for the next kid who comes along.
In April 2012, the Boston Herald drew attention to Warren's law directory entries from 1986 to 1995, in which she had self-identified as having Native American ancestry.[49][50] According to Warren and her brothers, they grew up "listening to our mother and grandmother and other relatives talk about our family’s Cherokee and Delaware heritage".[51][52][53][54] The New England Historical Genealogical Society found no documentary proof of Warren having Native American lineage,[52][55] but the Oklahoma Historical Society said that finding a definitive answer about Native American heritage can be difficult because of intermarriage and even deliberate avoidance of registration.[56] Her ethnicity claims became the focus of election coverage in the media for several weeks, during which her opponents demanded answers; members of the Cherokee Nation protested her claims and questioned how it influenced her employers.[49] Harvard Law School had added her to a list of minority professors in response to criticisms about a lack of faculty diversity, but Warren said that she was unaware that Harvard had done so until she read about it in a newspaper.[57][58][59] Colleagues and supervisors at the schools where she had worked have publicly stated that she did not receive preferential treatment.

Warren received a primetime2012 Democratic National Convention, immediately before Bill Clinton, on the evening of September 5, 2012. Warren positioned herself as a champion of a beleaguered middle class that "has been chipped, squeezed, and hammered." According to Warren, "People feel like the system is rigged against them. And here's the painful part: They're right. The system is rigged." Warren said that Wall Street CEOs "wrecked our economy and destroyed millions of jobs" and that they "still strut around congress, no shame, demanding favors, and acting like we should thank them."

At Warren's first Banking Committee hearing on February 14, 2013, she pressed several banking regulators to answer when they had last taken a Wall Street bank to trial and stated, "I'm really concerned that 'too big to fail' has become 'too big for trial.'" Videos of Warren's questioning became popular on the internet, amassing more than 1 million views in a matter of days.[70] At a Banking Committee hearing in March, Warren questioned Treasury Department officials why criminal charges were not brought against HSBC for its money laundering practices. With her questions being continually dodged and her visibly upset, Warren then compared money laundering to drug possession, saying "if you’re caught with an ounce of cocaine, the chances are good you’re going to go to jail... But evidently, if you launder nearly a billion dollars for drug cartels and violate our international sanctions, your company pays a fine and you go home and sleep in your own bed at night."

In May, Warren sent letters to Justice Department, Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Federal Reserve, questioning their decisions that settling rather than going to court would be more fruitful.[74] Later that month, Warren introduced her first bill, the Bank on Student Loans Fairness Act, which would allow students to take out government education loans at the same rate that banks such as Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan Chase pay to borrow from the federal government. Suggesting that students should get "the same great deal that banks get," Warren proposed that new student borrowers be able to take out a federally subsidized loan at 0.75%, the rate paid by banks, compared with the current 3.4% student loan rate.[75] Endorsing her bill days after its introduction, Independent Senator from Vermont Bernie Sanders stated: "the only thing wrong with this bill is that [she] thought of it and I didn’t" on The Thom Hartmann Program.[76]

Warren and her daughter Amelia Tyagi wrote The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke. Warren and Tyagi point out that a fully employed worker today earns less inflation-adjusted income than a fully employed worker did 30 years ago. Although families spend less today on clothing, appliances, and other consumption, the costs of core expenses such as mortgages, health care, transportation, and child care have increased dramatically. The result is, that even with two income-earners, families are no longer able to save and they have incurred greater and greater debt.

In an article in The New York Times, Jeff Madrick said of Warren's book:
The authors find that it is not the free-spending young or the incapacitated elderly who are declaring bankruptcy so much as families with children ... their main thesis is undeniable. Typical families often cannot afford the high-quality education, health care, and neighborhoods required to be middle class today. More clearly than anyone else, I think, Ms. Warren and Ms. Tyagi have shown how little attention the nation and our government have paid to the way Americans really live.



A.N.T.S. minus N.
 equals 
~(Automatic Thoughts)~

ELIZ~(A)~WAR
Queen Elizabeth Celebriduck

"The only thing wrong with this bill is that [she] thought of it and I didn't."
~(Independent Senator from Vermont Bernie Sanders)~

***

"Donna.  Are you not aware, just how much...MORE...Joy Beyer has done for your little baby brother than all your chocolate chip cookies put together?" 
~(Simply Jim:  Mature Methodist Fag)~

"OH I HATE HER!"
~(My Big Sister)~

"Mother.  I will have say this to my sister's defense.  What she lacks in intelligence (worldliness)  she makes up for in loyalty to her family.
~(Simply Jim:  Little Baby Brother the Accident)~"

"Why...yes!"
~(My Mother:  Hell Betty Jo)~

"Mother....we've discussed this already.  Not always a good thing.  In my case it certainly isn't.  
Remember... 
"love stronger than justice" 
as opposed to 
'injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere?'
Remember?   
Any of this...at all?"
~(Simply Jim:  Mature Methodist C.racked O.ut W.hore)~


***

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put Humpty together again.

The rhyme does not explicitly state that the subject is an egg, possibly because it may have been originally posed as a riddle.[1] There are also various theories of an original "Humpty Dumpty". 

Humpty appears in Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass (1872), where he discusses semantics and pragmatics with Alice.[20]
    "I don't know what you mean by 'glory,' " Alice said.
    Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't—till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!' "
    "But 'glory' doesn't mean 'a nice knock-down argument'," Alice objected.
    "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less."
    "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
    "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master—that's all."
    Alice was too much puzzled to say anything, so after a minute Humpty Dumpty began again. "They've a temper, some of them—particularly verbs, they're the proudest—adjectives you can do anything with, but not verbs—however, I can manage the whole lot! Impenetrability! That's what I say!"[21]
This passage was used in Britain by Lord Atkin in his dissenting judgement in the seminal case Liversidge v. Anderson (1942), where he protested about the distortion of a statute by the majority of the House of Lords.[22] It also became a popular citation in United States legal opinions, appearing in 250 judicial decisions in the Westlaw database as of April 19, 2008, including two Supreme Court cases (TVA v. Hill and Zschernig v. Miller).[23]
It has been suggested by A. J. Larner that Carroll's Humpty Dumpty had prosopagnosia on the basis of his description of his finding faces hard to recognise.
    "The face is what one goes by, generally," Alice remarked in a thoughtful tone.
    "That's just what I complain of," said Humpty Dumpty. "Your face is the same as everybody has—the two eyes,—" (marking their places in the air with his thumb) "nose in the middle, mouth under. It's always the same. Now if you had the two eyes on the same side of the nose, for instance—or the mouth at the top—that would be some help."[24]

***





They don't care how educated a gay man is either...
 He's still a faggot."

***

W. W. Denslow's vs. Charles and David  Denson vs. WWW.
equals...
STOPPING HERE.

TWISTED PURPLE COW
by 
Simply Jim
~(6!9)~


This is getting just too weird.  


Saturday, January 3, 2015

MUST BE NICE: ENABLED A GODSEND?

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

New Year, New Rules: A Look At Laws Going Into Effect In 2015 - ABC News

New Year, New Rules: A Look At Laws Going Into Effect In 2015 - ABC News: Driving forward: All California residents, regardless of immigration status, will be eligible to apply for a driver's license after passing The Safe and Responsible Driver Act (AB60) in 2013. 1.4 million undocumented Californians will be eligible to apply for licenses under the new law.



Avatar

Was talking politics with a waitress at Waffle House one morning. Me being a bleeding heart liberal, she volunteers that she's part Indian and part Czechoslovakian. Why is it always a conservative volunteering that they are part Indian when participating in political discussions? She looked nothing like an Indian! How far must we go finding a relative of these people that looks anything like an Indian? Is it so many miles this way? Or is it so many mile that way? Or is it...how many generation we must we go back finding that one Indian; almost always an opportunistic(?)female marrying a missionary unless a daughter of an Indian chief given away as a gift? "Oh reeeeeally! Which part?!" I came close to asking. Instead, I just let it go. Why bother. I'm pretty sure she probably wouldn't even know where to begin looking for Czechoslovakia on a globe if one was place in front of her. Turned out being a blessing I didn't. Before I was done eating, I saw this waitress motion for a homeless man to come in and she sat him down at a part of the counter away from the rest of us; paying for his breakfast herself.
 
Avatar
who talks politics at a waffle house? Man... eat !!!


 
Avatar
I do eat! Once it gets served.
    ***
    Following comment was removed without informing me of the reason...?
    It was inresponse to all the people complainging about illegal immigrants getting licenses to drive. 
    A lot of comparison to our deracination of the American Indians also.
    As far as our illegal immigrants go...they translate into cheap labor. You benefit from them being here more than you care to admit. You can not become wealthy without making someone else poorer. And they serve as a convenient outlet for misdirected aggression, a distraction, for our angry white males and their female halves who do not seem to understand how the more educated business conservative elites so easily pluck their frustrations into doing the dirty work for them.
       At the same time being against a national ID card, but for the building of an impenetrable wall along our border instead; you will never be able keeping cheap labor from finding a way into America. Not when one considers America's huge appetite for illegal drugs. Not when one considers the guns associated with a lot of the violence South of the border in the "War against Drugs" were easily acquired here in America. These conservative business elites know what they are doing...guaranteeing keeping wages competitively low.

      During the Romney/Obama election one sunny afternoon, couldn't help but notice while driving through a very wealthy part of Atlanta, all the crews busy at work maintaining expansive lawns in front of huge homes/mansions set way back from the street. But lining the street was one VOTE ROMNEY/RYAN signs after another. Only saw one OBAMA/BIDEN sign.

      MY GOD YOU SHOULD HAVE SEEN THIS! There were way more Hispanics per square mile working these lawns than there were W.A.S.P.s living in these homes. And this doesn't even begin getting into counting the domestic helps probably inside these homes?

      Talk about a paradox. They have got to know exactly what they are doing! Plucking you PECKERWOODS' strings into doing their dirty work for them.
      They obviously don't care about you either!

    Friday, January 2, 2015

    Idaho Woman Shot by Son at Walmart Remembered as Scientist, Loving Mom - Yahoo News


    Idaho Woman Shot by Son at Walmart Remembered as Scientist, Loving Mom - Yahoo News: Veronica Rutledge, who police say died after her toddler removed a concealed handgun from her purse at Walmart and shot her, worked at the Idaho National Laboratory. She was also a responsible gun owner, her father-in-law said.

    ***
    No one's a criminal until they get caught. Therefore, every gun owner is a potential crime waiting to happen if not already a criminal needing to find.

    The person killed could have been someone else; a gun control advocate. You don't have to worry about someone not owning a gun killing you with a gun. Or having a gun stolen killing you.

    Bad guns are good guns: effectively producing desired intention(S) the given amount of time.

    CRIMES!!!!!BEFORE CRIMINAL?NEEDING TO FIND!
    For example...

    SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MASSACRE

    On March 28, 2013, court documents released from the investigation showed that the school shooting had occurred in the space of less than five minutes with 156 shots fired. This comprised 154 shots from the rifle and two shots from the 10mm pistol. Lanza fired one shot from the Glock in the hallway and killed himself with another shot from the pistol to the head.


    Can not be argued that those guns were not good guns before the good guys showed up with their bad guns; bad guns from the perspective of their guns being on the clock 24/7.

    24/7...
     applies to the guns of our vigilante wannabes as well.

    In other words,
    not effectively producing desired intention given amount of time.
    I know all this sounds redundant,
     but you have to with these kind of people and their abundant thoughts terminating cliches;
    one per every issue being debated.
    This point aside,
    the gun itself...
     did do what it was made to do.
    Good guy?
     Bad guy?
    Why should this make a difference...?

    Even a baby can stop someone with gun.

    GIVE THAT BABY A METAL!!!

    The legacy of Mario Cuomo’s 1984 'Tale of Two Cities' speech - Yahoo News

    The legacy of Mario Cuomo’s 1984 'Tale of Two Cities' speech - Yahoo News: “You campaign in poetry; you govern in prose,” Cuomo famously said. But the latter follows the former, and Democrats need a new, more modern verse.

    Thursday, January 1, 2015

    When Feuding With Your Neighbor Over a Fence Gets Out of Hand - Yahoo News



    When Feuding With Your Neighbor Over a Fence Gets Out of Hand - Yahoo News: Each side says the other is lying, but paperwork is now flying in both directions. The Dominguez’s and the Martinez’s sued each other. A judge’s injunction orders both families to stop everything, and a city agency is demanding Dominguez tear down his beloved metal borderline once and for all.

    As for the rest of the residents in the neighborhood, they say the feud is ruining their peace and quiet, not to mention their property values.

    The only thing the Martinez’s and the Dominguez’s do agree on is that it may take one family to move to finally end it all. But they would both prefer it to be the other family who leaves.


    ***


    Found this article extremely amusing!