JELLYFISH AND A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE

JELLYFISH AND A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE
BE CAREFUL!!! GOT A FRIEND WITH ME HAVING THE LUCKY FIN OF A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE! WE CAN BE VERBALLY AGGRESSIVE.

E = mc3: THE NEED FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY

E = mc3: THE NEED FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY
FUSION CUISINE: JESUS, EINSTEIN, and MICKEY MOUSE + INTERNETS (E = mc3) = TAO ~g(ZERO the HERO)d~OG

About Me

My photo
Hearing impaired (tendency to appear dumb, dense, and/or aloof), orthodox atheist (believe faith more harmful than doubt), self depreciating sense of humor (confident/not to be confused with low self esteem), ribald sense of humor (satorical/mocking when sensing Condescension), confirmed bachelor (my fate if not my choosing), freakish inclination (unpredictable non-traditionalist opinions), free spirit (nor conformist bohemian) Believe others have said it better...... "Jim! You can be SO SMART, but you can be SO DUMB!" "Jim! You make such a MARTYR of yourself." "He's a nice guy, but...." "You must be from up NORTH!" "You're such a DICK!" "You CRAZY!" "Where the HELL you from?" "Don't QUITE know how to take your personality." My favorite, "You have this... NEED... to be....HONEST!"

Sunday, August 28, 2016

SHOULD - THE FREE DICTIONARY






SHOULD


(sho͝od)

aux.v. Past tense of shall

1. Used to express obligation or duty: You should send her a note.
2. Used to express probability or expectation: They should arrive at noon.
3. Used to express conditionality or contingency: If she should fall, then so would I.
4. Used to moderate the directness or bluntness of a statement: should think he would
 like to go.

Usage Note: Just as they ignore the traditional rules governing the use of shall and will, Americans largely ignore the traditional rules governing the use of should and would. The two verbs are not always 
interchangeable, however. To express duty or obligation, should is required and functions as the 
equivalent of ought to: I (or you or heshould go.But would (and not should) is used to express willingness or promise (agreed that I would do itand to express habitual action in the past (In those days we wouldwalk along the canal at night). Would also has the advantage of being a polite substitute for will in 
requests: Would you lend me a dollar? Either should or would can be used in the first person to express 
the future from the point of view of the past, but one should bear in mind that should sounds more formal 
than would: He swore that I should (or less formally, wouldpay for the remark. The same principle appliesto the verb in sentences that express a hypothetical condition or event: If I had known that, I would (or 
more formally,shouldhave answered differently. In the second and third persons, however, only would is 
used: She assured us that she would (not shouldreturn. If he had known that, he would (not shouldhave answered differently. · Choosing which verb to use in conditional clauses, such as those beginning with 
if, can be tricky. In certain clauses, should is used for all three persons: If I (or you or heshould decide 
to go, we will need a larger car. If it should begin to snow, we will stay here tonight. Would is not 
acceptable in these if clauses, but it does appear in other kinds of conditional clauses:He might surprise 
you if you would give him a chance. The best advice is to follow what sounds most natural. When in 
doubt, writers can try a verb form in the indicative (if it begins to snow) or the subjunctive (if you were to 
give him chance). 

See Usage Notes at ifrathershall.


American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2011 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.





No comments:

Post a Comment