JELLYFISH AND A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE

JELLYFISH AND A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE
BE CAREFUL!!! GOT A FRIEND WITH ME HAVING THE LUCKY FIN OF A CLOWNFISH NAMED VOLTAIRE! WE CAN BE VERBALLY AGGRESSIVE.

E = mc3: THE NEED FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY

E = mc3: THE NEED FOR NEGATIVE THEOLOGY
FUSION CUISINE: JESUS, EINSTEIN, and MICKEY MOUSE + INTERNETS (E = mc3) = TAO ~g(ZERO the HERO)d~OG

About Me

My photo
Hearing impaired (tendency to appear dumb, dense, and/or aloof), orthodox atheist (believe faith more harmful than doubt), self depreciating sense of humor (confident/not to be confused with low self esteem), ribald sense of humor (satorical/mocking when sensing Condescension), confirmed bachelor (my fate if not my choosing), freakish inclination (unpredictable non-traditionalist opinions), free spirit (nor conformist bohemian) Believe others have said it better...... "Jim! You can be SO SMART, but you can be SO DUMB!" "Jim! You make such a MARTYR of yourself." "He's a nice guy, but...." "You must be from up NORTH!" "You're such a DICK!" "You CRAZY!" "Where the HELL you from?" "Don't QUITE know how to take your personality." My favorite, "You have this... NEED... to be....HONEST!"

Monday, July 18, 2016

MR. BLISS: MY NEXTDOOR.COM NEIGHBOR'S HAPPINESS?


James Avery ·
Overheard on CHANGE.ORG

This guy is a community nuisance, offensive, in violation, and direct defiance to county code ordinances. County code allows 24 sq ft ground signage 10 feet back from sidewalk. This resident has 120 sq ft ground signage, 5 times the allowable amount. Not to mention the seasonal inflatables, flag dancing, and yelling at cars. I want DeKalb county to uphold county codes to limit his infringement on my persuit of happiness.

Charles Bliss, Decatur, GA 2 months ago


MY GOD!

HOW HAPPY DOES MR. BLISS NEED TO BE?

btw No where in the constitution does it garantee you happiness: only the pursuit of it.
LikeReplyJust now
James Avery ·
Bobby, I have a question for you and your partner: what do you think would happen if I built a fence along my stretch of sidewalk the same as you and Charlie have built along your stretch of sidewalk except I made the side of my fence facing the road look the same as the back of your fence separating our two properties I'm having to look at every day.

And you two did the same with the section of your fence separating your property from the rental property next door to you.

Overheard on NEXTDOOR.COM

Nancy Sokolove from Mason Mill 26 Mar

I have noticed that in the last week or so, the signs are creeping down the hill little by little, against the wood fence of the house on the corner of Vistavia and Mason Mill. Although I certainly don't know the line between the properties, I'm assuming that since it's along the fence that he has gone over that property line. I was able to take a photo yesterday to document this.
Thank Flag
Patrick and Bobby thanked Nancy


Also I want to point out that you two only maintain the space between Mason Mill road and your fence running along the sidewalk halfway up the street. Point out that I'm the one who keeps the sidewalk blown off and the weeds under control the upper 1/3 of what is still your stretch of sidewalk.

Like I said during our court hearing before Judge Polk your failed attempt at a restraining issued against me, you two have your own ways of egging me on.

Overheard on NEXTDOOR.COM

Ron Mihelic from Mason Mill 6d ago

Since we all believe in rule of law , let's look at the Code..Code states verbatim.. " However, left completely unregulated, the number, size, design charecteristics, and locations of signs in the county can become a threat to public safety as a traffic hazard and a detriment to property values and to the county's general public welfare as well as create an aesthetic nuisance. The county, further, finds that signs have become excessive and that many signs are distracting and dangerous to motorists and pedestrians, are confusing to the public and substantially detract from the beauty and appearance of the county. The county finds there is a substantial need directly related the public health, safety and welfare to comprehensively address these concerns through the following regulations.." So we do have grounds to bring this in front of a judge. Without neighborhood involvement any judge presiding over this case will not understand the scope of the problem. This is a person who is a known and self admitted meth addict. He has been arrested several times (once for exposing himself to traffic). Has been institutionalized more than once. Has several restraining orders against him. Has been videotaped taking his neighbors trash from the curb. The reason why he has a large fence next to his property is because he was caught trespassing in his neighbor's backyard. Surely someone who has all these things happen is not just a misunderstood law abiding citizen who is angry about some trees from 10 years ago.
Thank Flag
Patrick, Bobby, Nancy, and 2 others thanked Ron


And while on the subject of restraining orders, one of you should have corrected your friend, Ronald Mihelic the Nathan Deal supporter ( and maybe even a "TRUMP!" "TRUMP!" "TRUMP!" supporter), when he posted onNEXTDOOR.COM that I have multiple restraining orders against me when in fact, none, as the Gary's restraining order (which I did not get the opportunity contesting) had expired and your attempt failed.

Overheard on NEXTDOOR.COM

Bobby Rasulnia from Mason Mill 26 Mar

One night a few years ago, he pointed a red laser light on our chests while we were sitting in our back yard from his bedroom window. Another time he came to our house banging on the front door holding three rubber ducks asking us to help him join the trinity with the elderly neighbors across the street. That elderly couple obtained a restraining order and eventually moved away due to his stalking behavior. The next time our neighbors defend his insanity with freedom of speech, we want them to talk with those who are most affected by it. This is not a freedom of speech issue people. It's a safety issue, an aesthetic nuisance, and a detriment to property values. U can not infringe upon another persons rights by exercising your rights. The explicit tone of his "message" and the use of profanity is obviously and clearly hate speech. As a society and a neighborhood we cannot tolerate his hate speech and asthetic nuisance any longer.
Thank Flag
Patrick, Nancy, and Staci thanked Bobby


And while on the subject of the red laser light, Bobby...AGAIN! We've already went through this during our court hearing before Judge Polk your...FAILED...attempt at a restraining order!

MY GOD!

Give it a rest!
LikeReplyJust now

No comments:

Post a Comment